Saturday, June 28, 2014

Now you can install Blockchain.info on iOS without jailbreak with thiseasy hack

This manual uses a
method WITHOUT JAILBREAKING your device. Only using your data-cable is required to upload software.


Instructions
Follow the steps depicted in the image I've attached above, then in Tongbu you should press button called "TUI", it will load unofficial hacked Chinese version of App Store. This shouldn't modify or customize your phone settings, but will allow you using apps deleted from App Store.

- Then after you installed TUI through Tongbu assistant, open TUI app on your iPhone and here you can search for blockchain and install it!


If you know anyone who still don't know this, please share and let them know. Blockchain was awesome wallet, and more people has access for such apps, the bigger impact it provides for Bitcoin.

I encourage everyone to download this app, just because I don't know how long Tongbu will be alive: because I believe Apple can easily take efforts for bringing such a useful hack down. On the other hand this Chinese app if used properly could benefit Apple, because it brings more openness and convenience to the end users.

Because at least for me the news about that I can access those deleted apps means everything and it is a really heart melting news for me - that makes me kinda love Apple.

Saturday, June 21, 2014

Fresh Facts & Numbers :: Bitcoin is vulnerable for targeted double-spending attacks from large ISPs

Audio version of this article can be found here https://soundcloud.com/earl-fox-1/fresh-facts-numbers-bitcoin-is

83 Generating your own mini-version of blockchain to "fake" blockchain for selected group of users.
lenaaa_444
When it comes to fraud, everybody start thinking about hackers, fraudsters, 51% mining pools or unfair exchanges like Mt.Gox. But since I'm working in a telecommunications field I was always bothered with a question - by holding such huge networks, customer base and biggest parks of network & server equipment, Internet Service Providers could be the next threat, if the whole thing would be organized by someone who knows what does it takes to perform such attack.

Maybe huge Internet Service Provider's management won't allow anybody building some "fraud plans" against their customers, but you always have to remember about employees which can have access for the firewall settings and the hardware of ISP, which is enough for performing the types of attacks directed on selected group of ISP customers.

Recently I've opened a thread in Reddit with my own questions about whether ISPs can fake the blockchain of its customers. You can find there some long discussion about threats and in this article I'm trying to describe my conclusion concerning what to expect or whether such kind of attacks even possible.

Yes it is possible. But it will take some huge investment. If you're talking about people who can afford to invest $150,000 just for performing fraud operations, I think there's plenty candidates among those who would be interested in doing so, because those "bad guys" who posses signficant amounts of money may want more money, and $150,000 for the ability of making fake transactions could sound pretty lovely for such people. The whole investment: $150,000 is needed for purchasing the most capable miners available on the market. On the mentioned Reddit thread I've tried to count how much hashing power such a bad guy can acquire for $150,000 and I've come up with a number of 60,000 GHashes or 30 items of "Prospero X-3 (batch 1)" $4899 or 8.7 BTC", that's how much of hashing power you can purchase in July 2014 for $150,000.

Now what attacker can do if he owns 60,000 GHash miners combined? Right, he can produce his own fake Blockchain. But with such relatively weak rate he can only produce 1 block for 14 days.

 hamer2271

You may think that it is too slow, or even won't work, because waiting 14 days with $150,000 equipment is stupid, because blocks are produced every 10 minutes all around the world. But you may not remember that ISP has access for such things as:
1) Monitoring the state of computers of their users by their IPs (whether computer turned off or turned on)
2) Use firewalls on their routing equipment (such as Cisco's,etc) to block access for IP ranges / ports / types of traffic.

What I'm trying to say that combination of such things as having access to routing and having huge hashing powers could give an attacker evil powers needed to perform an attack.

How does it happens technically
 svetlanka7264
Attacker which owns $150,000 equipment or 60,000GHs as I discovered above can mine 1 block during the 14 days.
1) ISP or ISP's representatives (such as sysadmins) can enable the firewall blocking all susceptible traffic from Bitcoin for chosen customers (let's say it will be IP addresses or contracts of people whom ISP already know as Bitcoin users, can be 1000 or 2000 people out of 200,000 customers)
2) Once traffic blocked, Bitcoin won't be able to communicate with external world and blocks will stop updating exactly at the time the attacker will choose. So since attacker chooses the time, he of course knows what is the current Bitcoin block is.
3) Once firewall enabled, attacker immediately starts mining the next block. The mining will be over in 14 days, because that's how much 60,000GHashes/second should work in order to achieve network performance which achieved by the whole world for 10 minutes (10 minutes vs 14 days).
4) So after 14 days attacker who also controls support tickets from the customers will know the customers which complained about their Bitcoin problems and he may not deal with their problems if he has access to behave like that in such a big ISP.
5) Once 14 days is over, attacker creates his small botnet of his Bitcoin clients, which will offer the the fake block as the next one. And also attacker can include any transactions he want into such block. And since many Bitcoin users may even not check or may not count the current blocks, they may think that any transaction occurred is valid, since Bitcoin never lies.

As bottom line, it is hard to deceive Bitcoin client, such attack requires a lots of competence & investment, but the key is that its still possible. What if such attack gonna happen if you're selling your car/house or something else? Of course many people will wait 3 or 6 blocks, but what if attacker invested 3 or 6 times more money? That will mean more chances to succeed to attacker.

On the one hand, when I talk about 3 or 6 times more money, it gets harder to imagine, who's able to spend such amounts of money: maybe someone rich and anonymous ;) 6 * $150,000 = $900,000 (almost $1 million dollars) Are you ready to spend 1 million dollars for the mining equipment if you would have such money? :) If you're ready then there's no problem generating 6 blocks during 14 days which is necessary for confirming 6 block in a row after Internet was restricted by the special person in the city's ISP.
 Swetik134444
On the other hand, if an attacker have $900,000, finding the right technician who will be ready to cooperate in any ISP company of the world won't be a big problem for such a bad guy. And that makes me sad about current level of Bitcoin's security.


Read my other Bitcoin blockchain related posts:
Destruction of Internet Lines in Worst-Case Scenario & Bitcoin
Fresh Facts & Numbers :: Exact prediction of Blockchain size depending on the transaction volume.
* Fiat money backed by Bitcoin
* nTimeLock may disappoint you

Bitcoin making us one step closer to Artificial Intelligence.

In a sense that it is autonomous and decides the fates of the millions (billions in a nearest future and trillions a 1000 years from now). Do you remember such topics that with proper A.I. technologies development we will have such smart self-driving cars, which would deliver us home? Bitcoin delivers you with not less significant A.I. solution with self-sustainable money.

You may heard of strong A.I. and weak A.I. too. Strong A.I. is an A.I. which can behave like a human - it is also called a full A.I. which mean that a program can think and solve problems the same way human does.

Weak or Narrow A.I. is the use of software to study or accomplish specific problem solving or reasoning tasks, according to Wikipedia. So Bitcoin is almost narrow A.I., because it solves the biggest problem of humanity ever known: TRUST.

Humanity always needed a medium of exchange, and they needed that solution. But without computers and Internet it was hard to provide such solution geographically.

When I talk about Bitcoin even to people in IT, sometimes they don't understand the word "decentralized". For me "decentralized" also means "autonomous" and autonomous is a marvelous quality. The beauty of Bitcoin's architecture is in its autonomous nature: no one is required to decide what's going on with your payments. The system wonderfully grants access for those who can own inputs (inputs is your Bitcoins - a limited pieces of which recorded in a public registry called blockchain protected by the cryptography). Once system grants you such an access, you can't lose it (if you intentionally won't lose your password), and only you have the rights to reassign the ownership for somebody else.

The fact that Bitcoin is Autonomous means that it makes some decisions for us. And those decisions are always correct. Bitcoin can't make a mistake or it can't be unfair, because machines never make mistakes, especially in cryptography. Autonomous means also that you don't have to deal with people in order to solve many of the problems, software solve those problems for you automatically.

Bitcoin's autonomy is possible because every time you interact with Bitcoin, you are dealing with internal components of the Bitcoin - and every coin never leaves the systems, and system knows every coin and no coins are inserted without knowledge of the system - Bitcoin is so smart, because it knows each of its customers, and because it knows to whom it should be thankful (the miners) for its existence, for the job done to overcome another hard obstacle, to drag out of the hay another block without which the whole system would lose all of its customers, because no blocks means no movement inside the system. We trust those components and cryptography algorithms behind them, because we can see and check its code (which is 100% open source), and that means that if you're a programmer you can even feel the autonomous system inside.

That's why I can claim Bitcoin to be the most significant step to Artificial Intelligence in this century.

Chargebacks


Bitcoin can't compete with credit cards until there is some kind of chargeback/fraud protection mechanism. http://www.reddit.com/user/cebrek

Credit cards can't compete with Bitcoin until all of the transactions won't become irreversible.

Chargeback mechanism is a very complicated machine, not fair, irrational, stupid and old-century. Think about this: chargebacks are made for stupid people who's leaving their credit card details everywhere in inappropriate places. 21st century is about irreversible payments and smart consumers.

Bitcoin won't compete with credit cards, Bitcoin will eat it.


Yeah, I've seen general public lately - they are easily using the services without even thinking about chargebacks: they are keep purchasing an apps from App Store - you can't reverse your payments on App Store.
Our country's payment gateways don't want to deal with credit card chargebacks and the whole economy built upon SMS confirmation + Credit Card = two technologies together to compensate ugliness of the chargeback concept (You can't chargeback anyway if you're using to pay with your credit card such gateway which requires SMS identification). The whole credit cards are ugly: CC fraud is immersive - they steal money everywhere and people are ready to accept it...
Also remember the eBay & PayPal - they also won't let you issue a chargeback against them.
When fraudsters want to take away the money from stupid consumer - there's nothing to stop them, because a consumer doesn't questions himself and trusts to words too much.
Also it is mostly not about ugly consumers who don't want to get smart - I'm think I can call myself smart since I'm always studying the info on the Internet before purchasing something - but there's still too narrow list web-sites which helps me to choose the companies which won't rip me off, it is about building greater tools like: reputation online resources which can't lie, the business owners also should provide more certification to the public, so that people knew that they can't be ripped of in case if they choose a business.
The problems exists not only within Bitcoin - we still haven't solved many problems with credit cards too - even though credit cards are with us for a very long time we still treat it as a relatively new thing. But personally I believe that credit cards aren't innovating anymore, because startup costs are too big.
I am myself wanted to setup many online businesses 10 years ago - and I went through many difficulties when it come to choose my credit card merchant provider. Setup costs mostly was from $150 and that what stopped me from even the idea of having my own shop. Plus I was very frustrated that I had to depend on the merchant provider's wish - too much problems to simply start accepting a credit cards! With Bitcoin I think many small businesses will love the ease of the business.

Friday, June 20, 2014

Destruction of Internet Lines in Worst-Case Scenario & Bitcoin


I know almost everything about the technical side of Bitcoin protocol & economical side of it, but probably still don't understand it enough to give exact answer on the economical/technical effects if the default fork in case of the Internet segmentation would be inevitable.
Imagine for example that something terrible happened to our ocean fiber optic lines all at once (maybe some vulcanos opened everywhere, or some weird nature events, or bad will of some countries who wish to destroy the connection between the whole American and Eurasian/Europe continents).
Let's imagine that Bitcoin already got mainstream and accepted in every country of the world. And then some disaster like terrorist country invasion, and then boom, no Internet connection to the outer world.
Imagine that such thing is happened to the Australian continent as an example, or maybe to the whole U.S. continent.
1) Imagine that such thing happened. I'm curious what's gonna happen to the main bitcoin's public ledger, if the connection with the whole continent will be absent for 3 MONTHS let's say. After those 3 months of 1 country having only its own internal Internet, how blocks will be generated, and once we have let's say Australian fork which is back with its own Bitcoins, then what's economically gonna happen to Australians?
2) Is there such worst-case scenario's are potentially possible: I mean exactly what can destroy Internet's global nature, and also what's gonna happen if the whole continent's government decides to isolate the whole country from the Internet by the physical ways (by emergent cut of fiber optics communication lines)? The same thing can happen when government decides to close physical access to the Internet for outer, so the whole country can access only to internal Internet resources.

Let's say such thing happened to U.S. which was disconnected from Europe for 3 months since right now.
If were a leader from Bitcoin Foundation, a person who needs to makes choice about what recommendations to give for the users of Bitcoin protocol - what would you recommend for the community? Here's few choices:
1) The problem is that in this case we will have 2 forks - A) American Bitcoin Fork; B) European Bitcoin Fork. The same thing is gonna happen to the American Litecoin Fork & European Litecoin Fork. We will have the duplicate forks for every continent. What if World Wide Segmentation occured, and the Internet is divided on 5 segments? That doesn't sounds funny anymore - it is like having 5 bitcoin forks, 5 litecoin forks, and most importantly - 5 dogecoin forks (and 1000 of other cryptocurrencies will have their own copies of fork). And if event lasts for more than 3 months, then even if all of the Internet segments will get back together, we still gonna have separate forks.
Imagine that before segmentation (separation of networks) you've had 1000 BTC (around $600,000 or half of million dollars) and you live in the United States. After segmentation you will be able to spend your $600,000 in U.S., and since the networks are separated, then you can go to Europe and spend the same amount of money 2nd time. You can buy 2 wonderful houses for such money in two different parts of the world!
But what kind of economical effect will follow such events? If there's 2 Internet segments, or 2 Accepted Bitcoin Blockchains in 2 different countries, then it will mean that those who have their savings in Bitcoin - will be happy about that, because both forks are functional, but how about overall Bitcoin economy? Since the currency is deflationary - it will be just okay to have a copy of the savings accepted to the public.
By the way my question is - since right now - what's stopping me and my team of developers from creation a 2nd Bitcoin fork which represents the whole copy of the current Bitcoin?
Since there's too much people already who's owning millions of dollars in Bitcoin, if 2nd copy of fork will be accepted somewhere, it will means that all of those people will run to that country in order to withdraw their coins into the other assets like gold, real estate, etc - because they in this case won't be sure if 2nd blockchain will be the same acceptable as it is right now.


Part #2


2) The Internet segmentation itself will mean not a very good time for economy. That's why it should happen, and we at least should have some backup fiber optic centers all around the world dedicated as the backup lines for Bitcoin Blockchain. These fiber optics in the peaceful time should be of course be loaded with the external worldwide traffic too (so that the investment could at least have ROI on itself), but that also means that the lines must be kept in secret from general public / government / anyone else.


3) Let's say that two continents were divided by Internet segmentation described above. Europe and U.S. But we still will have a backup line for a blockchain with capability of transferring the whole blockchain within 2 days back and forth. Does such help gonna count for the whole Bitcoin network to not divide? How does it technically will sound for Bitcoin?

Okay concerning this issue - there's still a lots of non-fiber-optic ways to transfer data between the continents - like wireless (through satellites), or even physical file delivery (like Airplane flying from Europe to U.S. and back, periodically delivering the main blockchain file).

Decentralization. In case of delayed blockchain delivery first question arises - is there someone who can benefit / cheat, in case if he has an access to control the delivery procedure? Yes - those person who delivers that file - gonna be able to build something like mining rig, then he can start mining Bitcoins, while the whole network is waiting for the updated blockchain, and he can potentially have few blocks mined ahead of the whole network right? The whole paragraph sounds complicated and very unlikely.

Intercontinental Synchronization. Let's say that Blockchain is always get delivered between 2 networks, every 2 days. But what again stops me from double-spending in this case? See, the network separation is very severe consequence - in order to accomplish successful mining, you should have an access to permanent communication line - for comparing the mining results of 2 continents. But is it possible to provide the steady connection with enough bandwidth the way two continents will be able to mine in the same mode as before Internet segmentation?

What happens, when mining pool claims to find a solution for a difficult problem? Right, it offers the next block of the transactions to be included into the next block of transactions. Two things happen once miner found a block:

1) Miner checks whether all of the transactions included are unspent.

2) Miner includes the transactions into the next block, after he checked the validity of each transaction.


Obviously, the bigger one will win and only the transactions of the bigger one will be valid.
Not necessarily. We have the other choice. We can choice the path of re-engineering the 2 blockchains in such a disastrous moments. Why? Because the situation is too complicated, and during the disaster nobody will refuse from using mainstream Bitcoin anyways - Europe users will keep using their Bitcoin wallets the same way as U.S. will do.
Then we have the weeks of waiting. There's no Internet connection, but economy doesn't sleeps - transactions must be done. So Europe will be apologetic about their blockchain acceptance, and U.S. will be apologetic about their blockchain - it is endless debate over who's more mighty, who has more rich people, who has more merchants, who has more hashing power.
Moreover you might be talking about 2014 where nobody cares about such events as Internet segmentation for a week, while I mean full-size 2020 Bitcoin Economy, where 2 huge world continents are totally depends from Bitcoin, and the whole infrastructure built through usage of the Bitcoin.
Of course first task is not allowing this thing to happen, but when it comes for emergency - sometimes nobody's prepared even in such a huge world. If it happens, then we will end-up with our nightmare - having 42 million coins instead of 21, and that is possible reality.
Blockchain reengineering will mean pruning 2 blockchains. Pruning process is finding out the balances of each openkey (each wallet), then you combine. E.g. if Alice has balance 5 BTC in one blockchain, then in the other blockchain she transacted the 5 BTC to Bob, then it means that we gonna rely on that. But if Alice has been transacted her 5 BTC to Bob in one blockchain, then she transacted her 5 BTC to Mary in the other blockchain, then in the new blockchain both Bob & Mary should get their transactions by increasing the quantity of coins in the protocol. It is convenient - because on the one hand Mary's & Bob's transactions won't be invalidated, on the other hand economy won't find out about it - the same thing is gonna happen, which happens every day with FED.

In case if you're pruning 2 created blockchains due to usage of both, you're having a problem with trust of those members of community, who's already 2 times spent their coins (e.g. brothers Winklevosses might fly to Europe at such time in order to spend their 100000 BTC, and Satoshi could fly to America to spend his 1 million BTC even though I believe he wouldn't do that, because he's a God).
We can of course validate both double-spent transaction even though it is unfair, but this thing can happen only once. Let's say Satoshi transfered 1 million of his Bitcoins to his other wallet on the 2nd blockchain, and on the 1st blockchain he put his 1 million to the other wallet - then he got richer on 1 million, but he can't do it twice, because of such hierarchy of 2 blockchains. So during such pruning everyone who had significant amount of Bitcoins already gonna win.
Its a good thing just the private individuals wins, but the problem is that this might be easily done by a corporation, who's planned such event, and who's invaded the Bitcoin Foundation and other huge Bitcoin clients too. Such combination would be deadly to Bitcoin and will enrich those corporations, but the key here is that it will be done only once.
In the news we will see it this way: "During the 3rd world Internet segmentation, the Bitcoin Economy suffered the most due to its architecture - we had 1 month of isolation of two continents, and after restoring the world after those disastrous effects done by the authorities of both unions, we've came to conclusion that we have to prune both blockchains. After premature analysis of both blockchain after all those events we've found out double-spent transactions on the amount of 12,000,000 bitcoins. We can't just simply cut of this amount of transactions, they're already done, coins are already in circulation in both jurisdictions, we've done all measures which we could by isolating targeted users from sending transactions internationally on the 2nd blockchain before pruning, but there was too many rich people who knew and was prepared to benefit on a disasters occurred. So Bitcoin Foundation come up with the proposal of including those 12,000,000 double-spent bitcoins into main blockchain, by increasing already set limit for 21,000,000 thus setting new limit of 33,000,000 bitcoins. New pruned fork is available for downloading since today, on bitcoin.org, MultiBit.org and the other major bitcoin client web-sites"

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Fresh Facts & Numbers :: Exact prediction of Blockchain size depending on the transaction volume.

It's true that Bitcoin will become more centralized over time. The capital costs of mining will grow. But not necessarily because of this issue. 100 terabytes today costs around $6000, and the price of that will fall over five years. Mining is not a huge a concern, though, because miners don't have to hold the entire blockchain. Other parts of the network will become more centralized. ~Benjamin Dees, http://www.reddit.com/user/benjamindees in the Reddit topic called Still don't understand how we gonna be able to handle Bitcoin if its Blockchain size will be over 100TB 
Mr.Dees came to this conclusion perhaps because there's widely distributed opinion about not being able to handle blockchain.

I write this post, to help Bitcoin users quit worrying about huge size of a Blockchain (Main Distributed Public Ledger of any cryptocurrency, especially Bitcoin - it is the file where all of the transactions stored since the Bitcoin creation).

We can know exact amount of transactions in Bitcoin network (since its creation in 2009), today (Jun 2014) the rough number of total transactions of Bitcoin is 40 millions (check this link to see updated numbers).

In order to find out how much Blockchain will be in size in few years from now, let's begin with transaction industry leaders facts:

If 7 billion people on Earth would use non-cash payments, this report would mean that 1 person performs around 50 transactions a year. But perhaps not every of 7 billion people on our planet right now are using non-cash payments, that's why it wouldn't be correct to hope that we will overcome this average number of transactions (333 billions, maybe few hundred billions more). So I'll use this number of transactions globally as basis to technical analysis for estimating Bitcoin's Blockchain size in future.

If you'll consider that Bitcoin will totally takeover that "non-cash" market it will means that the yearly volume of transactions (quantity of transactions) will be around 333 billions.

What it will mean for the Blockchain?

In order to calculate, how much megabytes of information every transaction will take in a blockchain, in case if transaction volume will start growing exponentially and will achieve the numbers around 333 billions which we already have in "non-cash" payments, I've examined how much data each transaction usually adds up to the Blockchain.

Approximately each 1 transaction for Bitcoin means around 575 bytes added to the size of Blockchain (Note that for Litecoin we have different average numbers - in Litecoin 1 transaction averagely takes around 1257 bytes - which is almost 1KB - so Litecoin's Blockchain theoretically should grow 2 times faster than Bitcoin's due to its scrypt architecture and its frequency of the blocks confirmed into the Blockchain).

Let's just imagine that next year all of the "non-cash" transactions become Bitcoin transaction, and here we have it: THE 333 BILLION TRANSACTIONS PER YEAR in BITCOINS!

So, it basically means: 27,75 billions transactions per month TRANSFERRED IN BITCOINS!
To compare with current amount of transactions in Bitcoin, it is: 40 million transactions! Tiny amount, in comparison with current global non-cash transactions quantity.
And I will remind you with 40 million transactions, our blockchain size is 23 GIGABYTES (up to Jun 2014)

Still you don't think that blockchain size isn't a problem for Bitcoin? Then, you just have to make some basic math: Average transaction size as I mentioned before is 575 bytes - that is about half of a kilobyte - that's how much disk space takes 1 transaction.

Now it should be easy for you to find out that roughly 27 billions per month (or 333blns/year) will take 27000000000 * 575 = 15525000000000 (or 15 terrabytes, 525 gigabytes).

I'll repeat.
Still you don't think that blockchain size isn't a problem for Bitcoin?
If my calculations is correct, then maybe you might just don't believe in such exponential growth for Bitcoin.
But if with non-cash payments - we understand, that the most population on the Earth use non-cash, just because they need to receive their salary, then do some few purchases/transfers which is possible only through non-cash transactions. And the common numbers showed us that average amount of transactions on each person on the earth is 50. But what if the rest of the Earth will get more active? Double this number, and you will get 100 transactions per each world's citizen, and that will mean double growth for the blockchain size each month - not 333 billions per year, but 666 per year, and not 15 terrabytes per month, but 30 terrabytes per month instead.

What if total Bitcoin will replace the paper cash? (and again that's adds up a lot more transactions to the so-called "non-cash" transactions worldwide).


What is the solutions?

Solution #1. Prune the blockchain, or introduce the new version of blockchain every month.
I think this is a great solution, because it is very easy to check whether old version blockchain balances corresponds to the balances transferred into a new version of blockchain. But in this case we will get another central point of failure: software managing company like "Bitcoin Foundation" which will presumably play role in introducing those versions of blockchain will have the authority to stop doing that in case if the regulators will find the ways to approach the offices of the Bitcoin Foundation / or arrest the owners of the software company.

Probably the whole process of switching from one version of blockchain to another could be decentralized by software solution, but I think that's sounds like another experiment which could even break the world's economy if some failure will happen during the experiment (Imagine that the whole system is broken at the volume of 333 billions of transactions)

So in this case my solution is pruning Blockchain each time it achieves 30 terrabytes or some other reasonable quantity of data. We can link those blockchains into the other structure - the global blockchain of blockchains :) Sounds funny, but as I understand this might be the case if the quantity of transactions will grow crazily.

Solution #2. The other solutions.
  • Each country creates its own cryptocurrency. Takes some marketing and cryptographic initiative from governments/corporations
  • The blockchain gonna become segmented and used only for large transactions while locally all the other transactions will be transacted through the third parties / other decentralized entities. I'm not studied this way deeply enough. 
So we will definitely have fun by creating those solutions



Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Still don't understand how we gonna handle Bitcoin if its size will be over 100TB


I believe we can achieve such size within 5 years, and I'm not pretty sure that Moore's law actually will work in the case if transaction volume will exponentially grow. I've made some calculations in the charts of my blog for two cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin & Litecoin): http://www.earlfox.com/2014/06/does-blockchain-size-depends-from-how.html And my calculations shows that each transaction approximately takes up to 1MB depending from the multiple parameters of currency. 2) Actually why the Litecoin's transactions are heavier? My calculations shows me that each Bitcoins transaction averagely takes only 500 kilobytes (0.5MB) in a blockchain, while averagely Litecoin transactions eats up over 1MB out of blockchain(!) - you can see it in chart mentioned above in my blog. So could somebody explain me again: what's gonna happen if such times (just hypothetically with all possible odds) will come faster than we expect the Moore's law to take effect: - What's gonna actually happen if the whole Bitcoin blockchain will have to be sustained on 20 HDDs? Does that means total end for miners decentralization? Does that gonna mean that only people who's will have 20 HDDs will be able to mine? Or if small sized HDDs also can mine, what is a problem with miners with a "Short Version of BlockChain?" I'm interested mostly in viable things only - where inconvenience buried? 3) I've heard that one of the solutions is a pruning the whole blockchain (for the convenience of miners). But if Bitcoin Foundation at some point will have to prune the blockchain and start it from scratch by leaving only last balances, then does the whole point of decentralization is going to be missed? Probably correct pruning won't cause any community effect of forking - in case if the whole transactions were transferred correctly onto a new blockchain - but what if TOO MANY OF USERS will want to fork in favor of holding 20 HDDs? The same question is boggling me about what's gonna happen if forks will be created naturally due to Global Internet Segmentation (what's gonna happen if Internet is splitted in half?)

Total Number of transactions for Litecoin (chart)

Since Litecoin haven't reached yet its essential point of popularity, at the current day (June 17, 2014) its really hard to find out even how much transactions has been made since the Litecoin creation.

So here's some numbers:

2,179,203: total number of transactions between genesis and last checkpoint (was at the block 456000

There is a convenient chart for the total Bitcoin transaction volume available at http://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-total but not for Litecoin unfortunately up to date.

But the good news is that at least now you know almost exact numbers for the quantity of transactions.
You can see which passphrases I've used in order to finally find out how much there is a total transaction quantity for Litecoin and Bitcoin:
bitcoin total transaction volume of today
litecoin total transaction volume of today
bitcoin total transaction volume
litecoin total transaction volume
transactions quantity litecoin totally
transactions quantity litecoin in total
transactions quantity litecoin total
how many transactions bitcoin totally?
how many transactions bitcoin has?
how much transactions bitcoin totally has?
how many transactions litecoin totally?
how many transactions litecoin has?
how much transactions litecoin totally has?
total transactions bitcoin
total transactions in bitcoins
total litecoin transactions
total in litecoin transactions
total bitcoin transactions

Conversation with Bitcoin girl ;)

Does the blockchain size depends from how often blocks confirmed?

Seems like Litecoin is 4 times faster accepting blocks, but isn't this means that Litecoin's blockchain grows 4 times faster?

I've analyzed the quantities of transactions for 2 cryptocurrencies:
1) Bitcoin http://blockchain.info/charts/n-transactions-total
2) Litecoin http://www.earlfox.com/2014/06/total-number-of-transactions-for.html

So let's compare:



Tips&Hints

  • If you have enemies, controlling their geolocation and other useful meta-information is easy - just find some reason to ask them to send you an email (asking is easier if you're still friends): and most likely it will reveal their real IP addresses and that will give you a real clue about in which city they are located.

Monday, June 16, 2014

Just realized, that Winklevosses can create their own decentralizedversion of Facebook based on purchased Facebook which they've lost toZuckerberg at first

If everyone will follow that pattern, then everybody who raised capital on decentralized payments network, will automatically be those richest guys who will create new decentralized era. And I believe those who got rich out of Bitcoin will pay back to decentralized software by creating giant applications of the same significance as Bitcoin itself

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Bitcoin Reddit Idea #0: Bitcoin Accepting Agent


Imagine some marketplace, where most sellers aren't accepting any credit cards. Everywhere around the world, especially in poorest countries, there's still so many places, where your debit or credit card won't get accepted, just because there's no such device.

Why owners missing such great opportunity? Why in 21st century every business owner can't afford simple POS terminal which expands customer base and flexibility and convenient service? (no change, electronic payments)
Because it is expensive to setup usual POS terminal. How much time and money does it takes to setup Bitcoin terminal - almost nothing - all you need is a simplest smartphone, Internet connection and Bitcoin application.

Now this opportunity. As Bitcoin community or entrepreneurs, we can find the ways, to improve our offline presence, just by offering local entrepreneurs who have their sales locations without any terminals.

You don't need to create your own iPhone/Android application to start helping everybody to accept Bitcoins, all you need is to persuade a business owner to purchase a smartphone and an Internet connection.
If you'll search good enough, then there's no doubt that cheapest new Android smartphone can be found locally just for ~$30 or $45 without contract. This is very good device to start accepting Bitcoins, and most owners need just that opportunity (and maybe some help with setting up an Internet connection, help in educating their cashiers on how to use the gadget to accept Bitcoin, also some web-site creation skills could be required so that you can create some place to redirect any users in your local Bitcoin community). Find such place which offers the cheapest phones, and now you know what you can recommend to the owner which is too greedy about investing into technology which can improve the quantity & quality of sales. And as an entrepreneur, you have the opportunity start providing network of convenient payments, and that's a great privilege - to be a pioneer in introducing new payment technology even if its only on your local markets.

Both of those things doesn't requires your investment, and requires minimal knowledge.
In order to provide customers for such businesses - you can just create some simple web-site or catalog of shops, where you gather together as much sellers as possible which is ready to accept Bitcoin for their purchases.

Also very good idea would be creating some service which helps to transfer funds to such sellers to whom you plan your visit - like purchasing used things, but, I already discussed it in the other articles.

Go back to original Reddit link post, and comment your thoughts on this idea: tell me more about yourself:
  • Where are you from?
  • How many markets (like groceries, stuff, etc) you have around you.
  • Did you saw any stores which doesn't offer any credit cards as a payment option?
  • What is the biggest obstacle which stops you from helping those people starting to accept Bitcoin?
  • What is the best option to monetize this idea?
  • What else obstacles can you predict which may occur during accepting payments?

Saturday, June 14, 2014

The most reliable automatic way of forgetting your Bitcoin private keys for 7 years

The problem with ntimelock is that you have to keep your raw data for the transaction, and also you must destroy your private key from which you've sent the transaction. You theoretically still have opportunity to double-spend your ntimelocked funds if you haven't destroyed your private key from the wallet from which you've sent ntimelocked funds, because inputs are still belonging to that wallet. Transaction will occur only on the event when nTimeLock raw data will be executed after the specified ntimelock.
I'm think the digital time capsule is greater, because its easier to setup than nTimeLock, even though nTimeLock would be better solution.
The greatest independent solution of course would be combining 2 methods: - Digital Time Capsule - e.g. ability to bruteforce during 1 year using reasonable amount of hardware. That's for sender privatekey. You have to create around 100 private key pairs upfront, so that you could slowly use them to deposit funds there, then destroying those private keys, relying only on bruteforce data and ntimelock raw transactions dumps saved to be executed on time. + nTimeLock itself in combination with Digital Time Capsule which applies to sender wallet. And all of the nTimeLock raw transactions are directed to one wallet, private keys of which won't be stolen.
So, you will have 100 sender wallets with Time Capsule key pairs which you will destroy after usage. Also you will have accessible not destroyed very well known private key from your recipient wallet, where you'll expect to receive funds after ntimelock event, once you'll push raw transaction data into the Bitcoin network.
I'm actively studying this topic right now, once I'll come up with solution, I think I will open a web-site helping others to use this open techniques to save their Bitcoins.

I'm glad to feel that I know the truth

Truth is that Bitcoin is the only currency that's gonna survive.
Everytime I see how people respond on the comments, I understand how far away they are from getting it. They don't get it obviously, because it hard to grasp.
They afraid this currency, they wouldn't trust it, because in their minds they allow scenario of Bitcoins becoming worth next to nothing.

But you know what? Bitcoins are so dirty, so stocked, attached and came to live on our computers, that they are irrevocably became the part of this world forever, and it already happened once userbase got through 1000 users.

You may think that I am crazy, but I'll tell you something:

 I've already invested all possible personal funds into the Bitcoin.
And in my pocket I see there is some metal fiat coins worth $5.
And current price of Bitcoin is $570 (at June 2014). 
So those $5 dollars I have right now can buy me 5 breads or 5 milk bottles. But I see greater potential in this money. Thanks to such low price which Bitcoin has right now I understand how much $5 dollars is! 
From now on, I am going to put to Bitcoin every single dime without which  I, my family and my business will be able to survive. 

Because I know that even 10 cents matters when it comes to investing to Bitcoin today, in June of 2014. Because 10 cents might easily become $100 in future.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

Vladimir Putin and Russian National Cards Processor


To create something like that, there should be a market demand. You can't just say to people - we should use this, because the other companies are forbidden.
The Visa and Mastercard currently controls 90% of Russian payments - that means that 90% users prefer using these cards - and switching somwhere else could be way hard.

As a deadline our Russian government they've chosen to ask Visa/MasterCard to pay $2 billion dollars as a combenzation for their destructive actions for Russia.
Visa officially refused to do ett. So that's the problem when two parties can't come to the agreement.
What's gonna happen on July 1st, 2014? Nobody kbnows, but I'm pretty sure that Visa/MasterCard will continue working on our territory, even though I'm personally go against those paymentSystems, but only in favor to something like Bitcoin, and not some uPtin head sfx currency.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Fiat money backed by Bitcoin




Or fiat money hacked by Bitcoin.
 You know what - every person already puts too much of his trust into pieces of paper.
Imagine - many people even ready to put on card their 30 to 60 days of their hard working labor in poor counties. Before you get paid here, most of us rely just on a chance of being or not being scammed by employer.

Also even when you're doing some purchases from $1,000 to $5,000 you are trusting a paper again. Because you are not machine to be even 50% sure whether it is real papers.

People love their fiat money. They are loving to say "I believe only in money which I can touch"

Credit cards aren't accepted yet in 90% of places like landlord, private services, purchasing from hands, and many other cases, because CC epayments itself is a new technology

Why fiat money even can exist?! How does it happen to still exist in 2014!!! In the world of Toyota's, credit cards and the portable mobility?!

Remember - fiat money is 300-400 years old technology! Why I am calling it technology? Because fiat also falls under specifics of technological features. Feature #1 of fiat is watermarks, different security hard to fake mostly designed for human eye recognition (now thru special devices like infrared - which in 90% cash cases even NOT USED which means almost the same like accepting Bitcoin with 0 network confirmations)

Even with all these security flaws in paper money - people still use it, an that is shouldn't be missed when developing new technology.

My vision is clear on this subject - there's nothing wrong with creating Bitcoin reserved central bank. In this case each Bitcoin note will be very protected like the dollar and other currency bills. With only difference that you will see a special id number by which you can exchange this not for real digital Bitcoins.

Such central bank should have camera's inside the private building which documents the process of making such money.

This idea perhaps isn't new of course: in history there was many attempts from making money from Gold. But such attempts failed for the reason of massive acceptance of IOUs dictated by banks.

Plus if you're losing physical gold - you've lost not only the money, but precious metal itself which could be otherwise used for other purposes.

But again - not using gold is more political reason.

Why am I advocating this idea of fiat money backed by Bitcoin? While I understand that the real value is in its electronic usage, there is also very important role of synchronizing fiat money with Bitcoins too: it's because this will give to people better understanding of value and reliability proof of p2p cryptocurrency. 

You may ask: what is the difference between the FED and Bitcoin Central Bank?

It's easy:
1) Money printed with Bitcoin Central Bank isn't just uncontrolled printed money - it is a transparent non-profit organization which should be able to provide the proof that double printing doesn't occur. Each banknote will have a serial number which will give right to owner for releasing funds to the Owner Bitcoin Wallet, after certified banknote destruction.
2) Each banknote can be checked online for identification of its authenticity (through open key to wallet where funds shouldn't be spent)
3) Organization which prints money shouldn't know the private keys for wallets.
4) Banknote users also don't know the private key, but under the secret area in each banknote there is a hidden code which lets to redeem that banknote by its destruction in special certified centers available in every city. The hidden code aren't disclosed to anybody even central bank doesn't knows it.

Technologically there's no obstacles for this idea to work.
There's only one thing where bank could get corrupt - in stealing user's secret codes written inside currency.
And if such thing somehow happens - screw such bank, because the whole idea is based on bringing Bitcoin to mainstream.

I'm really curious yet - is there any technology in the world which can produce cheap chips (like inside of modernisated plastic cards), where you can write secret code, but secret code could be readed by special ATM only - which could destroy the card after redeeming it?

Ive opened the reddit topic about this question
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27x0n6/need_advice_from_crypto_expert_is_there/

Also there it's fun to imagine what value we would give for physical Bitcoins.

Current price of Bitcoins is $620 so today it would be:
- 0.1 btc - $62
- 0.05 btc - $31
- 0.01 btc - $6.2
- 0.005 btc - $3.1
- 0.001 btc - $0.62
- 0.0005 btc - $0.31
- 0.0001 btc - $0.06
- 0.00005 btc - $0.03
- 0.00001 btc - $0.006

Such bills as 0.00001 may sound rediculus at the $620 per btc, but once 1 btc becomes over $1000 - it becomes easier to use such units as 0.00001 - because now with $1000 per btc 0.00001 is equal to $0.01 (1 cent versus 0.62 cents with $620 per BTC)

What's wrong with Bitcoin central bank as long as you can check the validity of each cash.

I just can imagine Bitcoin paper bills issued by every government of the world, and controlled by the government with all that policy against counterfeiting and now with additional validity check - in order for your paper cash to be valid - it should be unspent. Also as a citizen you will have the ability to spend it by going to bank (bank should destroy it by law after spending it - spending means sending it on a Bitcoin wallet electronically)

Remember, one day cash was backed by gold. Now why we don't back it with Bitcoin? There always will be in the next 2 decades such an old fashioned people who still prefers cash. Why we don't protect those people by creating a central bank. I think the article author is talking exactly about that, and you Bitcoin community is just showing how much you're obsessed by the whole idea of non-cash transfer, without giving a clue that some people hate non-cash transfers because of its complexity for their age.

Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Is it possible to create other cryptocurrency without accepting any mining pools into its ecosystem?

Or why pools even exist in such centralized way? 1st reason - it's because it is not possible to benefit from mining if you are doing it alone.

If there someone would created such cryptocurrency which divides rewards in micropayments to each miner, then that would be way more honest system.

How to make it possible to accomplish it technically?
Decentralized pool as part of solution.
What if we are introduced the pool for Bitcoin which affords us to automatically award all miners their incomes? At the end of the day are the commissions spent on transactions by currency users are also divided on every pool member?


Monday, June 9, 2014

By learning new things about Bitcoin, don't get too consumed by them because it can harm your financial independence

Stop behaving like a child. That's a trap created by your own brain.
On the one hand you understand that participating in Bitcoin economy is important. But while fiat is mainstream yet, the Bitcoin economy doesn't really exists! You have to create it from scratch. But it's the longest path. Without right tools, right HR you can't contribute anything significant to the cryptocurrency NOW, because before Bitcoin will stand up and will walk on its own feets, you'll have to sacrifice and burn the fiat money.

That's the ritual. Follow it and mind your own business.

Reason why eBay and Bitcoin means a lot today

Historically the eBay is the biggest trading platform for the last decade. eBay has major customer base and recognition throughout the world.
Even without Bitcoin many online retailers and other Internet giants had hundreds of thousands attempts throughout the world to repeat the success of eBay on a global or at least local scale. But it is not so easy, partially it's due to already existing competition in the face of current eBay which provides better service globally the way that even most of the local trading platforms can't accomplish for their local markets.
eBay is getting popular, because it is global marketplace - which means not only global accessibility to the end users, but also wider range of used products available from peers (sellers) who participate in this global economy by providing abundance of products and high rate of competition within platform (among internal users; i.e. Internal competition)

Due to so many failures of local/global market places to repeat ebay's customer variety and satisfaction success - fair question arises:
- at this point can any platform be created with the same service and convenience eBay has, but with Bitcoins as a main currency?

Aside from phrases like "everything's possible in our digital age", let's get to numbers first:
- Such an attempt has been done already. You can read about it, it existed in the end of 2013 for almost few years - the name of the platform is BitMit - thousand of users chosen this platform, but one day management team of the website had chosen to close the project due too huge quantity of overwhelming technical problems. To me it's just seems like it was just plain lack of investment, which even shouldn't be a problem for a such startup.

Right now on June 2014 it's already all around the news the fact that eBay CEO is all the way heading towards starting to accept Bitcoin.

The PayPal giant just walks on the heads of potential startups, by not reveling the plans about Bitcoin, and once upon a day a month before it's date we will just hear that Bitcoin is added to the list of accepted methods of payment in PayPal.

Meanwhile all I can tell to Bitcoin community is the only thing, even though eBay doesn't seem like such a evil to all of us:
- You are losers, because you've lost all of your chances and wars. First time you've lost it when you believed and crypto currency too late, the second time you're getting even more useless when at 2012, you haven't cooperated your efforts to create web development team which could successfully handle such a big concept as crypto-eBay alternative.
You're losing this battle, not because the fact that eBay is starts to accept cryptocurrency is bad for Bitcoin (maybe it's not so bad), you are losing it, because you're such a useless, because you even can't create simple trading platform with Bitcoin payments at the core.
You're useless as community, just because you haven't even tried. Yes attempts like BitMit was awesome and I would use it, but that's another thing you've lost - the BitMit platform - which was closed mostly because of some childish management related issues easily fixable by two or three kick starter or other fundraiser campaigns.
You are as a community useless, because you choose to be greedy, because there's just too much of you who's here to watch. And watching is all you can do properly. 
Yeah! You can shout out loud about ongoing problems, you can like important topics, and make bold statements on hot Bitcoin subreddit topics. 
But you're a vegetables and you know it.

And you are, just because you haven't created any significant project yet which at least replicates existing monetary services online. You will say - well even if the service will exist, how do we gonna be able to compete with eBay later when it will start accepting Bitcoins?
 First off - as a business with all users you can coexist and don't really have to compete in the same areas by adjusting market niches. 
 Second off - who said that you have to supersede eBay in sales immediately? You've been given 2 years! 2 freaking years!!! What did you did all those time?

Right you were here reading blogs, kept searching new videos on YouTube upon "Bitcoin" search query. But deep inside you know, that YouTube doesn't cares about how much youtube views you've generated for Bitcoin video related creators. 

And most often those creators of content about Bitcoin don't even care about Bitcoin, instead they are hoping to get some views from the stupid people who's keep searching "Bitcoin" on YouTube over and over again. Stop doing that. Because Bitcoin don't resides in YouTube. You can't take over YouTube with Bitcoin or reddit - all you do, is creating fake popularity of unpopular things.

Hurry Up To Buy Bitcoin Now At The Price of $633 per 1 BTC (you should hurry up to do it in summer, because there won't be other chance)

After a huge companies like eBay will adopt Bitcoin for their services prices will get skyrocketed to the levels of tens of thousands dollars(!). In tha next few months that's what gonna happen to Bitcoin.

You better hurryups with your financial assets. Because Bitcoin train is about to go on a higher speeds, and you're about to loose it - it will grow exponentially and there's no way to stop it.

What Bitcoin concensus is


  • Bitcoin Foundation
    • Users
  • Bitcoin Exchanges
  • Online Wallets
    • Blockchain.info
  • More members to join during the evolution happening to Bitcoin
Core Bitcoin protocol will stabilize and freeze for 10 to 50 years, in the 2014 to 2016 terms will be defined.
This is the history of COMPUTER SCIENCE

basic bitcoin security

Multisig makes possible to reverse transaction. Arbitration provider could be inclded in multisig. You choose arbitration provider. You can introduce aribtration privder. Real Estate expert could be AP in multisig with property. Experience in different kinds of transactions is important. You open up entire market. You can have multiple arbitration providers. Idea is that you have a wallet - spending of which is it need to be signed by two users. We're introducing arbitration opportunities - like telephone confirmation / sms confirmation used with multisig. Flxblty. MultiSig is huge. First it was introduced on November 2012, Nov 2013 is when its started mined. EwrySVC. If you start large-style non-determenisitic addresses. OpenAddress per tranZaxiWonMipOwikec. Hierarchical deterministic wallets vs MultiSig. Boardwakel. 32bitsfx FollowXM. Hierdet you can get lost in. MakFiS TReZSore StrukkTire BranchedWixTree
Cross-reference. eBay may introduce MultiSig in order to confirm tranzactiNoNe. Afx-MXz ZiXe. ZiXeMp. p0x8m If you hefx a prawblem arbitrage escrow and marketplace that's a hudnred milion dollar industries.

Sunday, June 8, 2014

How Bitcoin could affect immigration? (update from July 29, 2014)


In the world of cryptoanarchy, I've heard such a belief that Bitcoin could even wipe the immigration borders in the nearest future. So, that why I thought it would be good idea to consider the facts in this aritcle about properties of the Bitcoin when it comes to immigration, border terms and living in a financial world which doesn't rely on authorities.

First off, I want to put here a disclaimer that I'm not a supporter of illegal immigration, and that I'm not encouraging anybody to follow my advises or use this article as a steps for real immigration.

1. New Era of Digital Governments

Since I talk about cryptoanarchy, it worth mentioning that even though Bitcoin could be a great provider as solutions for so-called citizens of the world to live independently, on the other hand government also doesn't sleeps.

Digitizing passports/IDs will bring us to its first revolution - digitizing authentication methods of citizens. That will mean, that no more IDs or other paper documents will be required to authenticate a user.

The key here is providing trustworthy system for police officers

Who need to authenticate a person. Just think about this - everyone can remember 4 digits belonging to themselves. And also everybody has a name - government can easily upload all the photos into the regulatory database consisting all the passport data. So next time in order to see the person's data, it doesn't even required to have any paper documents - all you need is an access to the government portal and knowing your 4 digits assigned next to your name. So next time you'll face police officer during the regular street check, or driver license check, as a good citizen you must provide the officer your 4 digits and a full name, then officer who must have a portable Internet access gonna be checking your identity through public online portal which even gonna show your photo. Even iPhone will have such app, not only for police officers, but for any services where it usually takes to unveil your identity.

In my previous article about Bitcoin and its effects on taxation

I've already considered the fact that even though if Bitcoin will become a mainstream money by all means, government won't lose people as its taxpayers, at least for next decade I don't believe that there will be very radical changes to the government forms - just the current regulators will change their model from "making money out of thin air" into the model "letting people pay for thin air" - since in digital era government won't have anymore the ability to efficiently track financial transactions of businesses, it will bring its influence stronger in a new profit-independent taxation forms - the leader measure of taxes in next few decades will be a property-based, land-based and per-person based taxation.

Also government is going to invade digital forms of contracts when it comes to property.

Everything you dreamed of - rental, selling/purchasing and other stuff will be available to you as a service from government - this will have as benefits, as a downsides: The rental/buying practices of such viable thing as real estate will become way safer, on the other hand the safety government provides will turn into a financial burden for everybody - very few property contracts will be able to be sold by traditional "fiat money" or without forming electrical ticket for initiating a contract to sell property. So no more papers - only online sales of property and mandatory taxes is our future - without online access to government portal and sales assistance we won't be able to claim our right to property anymore. (Of course for those who live in 2015-2020 yet there is a one last chance for a crypto-anarchy community - is switching accents to the property records decentralization means, but I foresee that crypto-anarchy community will fail in such attempt, because it takes collective guts and brains to implement such anarchic feature and build trust over the autonomous IT system and infrastructure)

For those crypto-anarchysts/liberalists who are believe into bright future of border-less world driven by crypto-currency, there is a very important moments:

1) It will be very unlikely in future, that you will be able to live illegally on any territory of the world, because everything will be electronically counted, divided, and police and the whole system will easier find out about those who doesn't have an immigration documents
2) Separative movement of those people who live by communities in the places upon which government can't have control will still exist as opposed to the system. That's gonna be people who's successfully live by their own on territories independent from government, whose properties are uncontrolled by the governments.


Read more about:
* How KeyHotee can revolutionize the whole Internet authorization system
* New era of Decentralization! Bitcoin is here to decentralize everything for creating the world free of censorship


(C) DimyFunklett, TrueBouncer.com


Ron Paul on Gold, Bitcoin, Immigration and the GOP

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bAcctnZ9c0


Not even Ron Paul understands the potential of Bitcoin. You could perfectly have a minted bitcoin out of anything like plastic, with it's qr code on it. you can print your wallet on a sheet of paper. all you need is someone with an electronic device to read it. buying gold today would be very hard and inefficient without telephones or the internet, so the value of gold would also drop, without any kind of electronic device.
But it's very unlikely for us to really lose our ability to maintain electricity or som kind of digital communications.
So, the only point Ron Paul  is making, is that it is to difficult for people to understand, how it works out for them personally. this is just a matter of time, and this could make gold really somewhat obsolete.
remember, this view about btc applies only as long as nobody can hack the crypto source or shutdown the internet entirely
I think he understands that if you don't have a computer you can't generate, or purchase. Love the idea of it all, but I don't trust it. Congress or the feds dont want to go after it...fishy.  Does anyone know the true creator of it? One would think most free thinkers would question bitcoin.
What are you some sort of left wing statist conspiracy denier loon? What do you think QE 1,2,3 to infinity is? You clearly have no clue what Ron Paul represents. You should actually listen to the man instead of parroting some BS like 'conspiracy theorist' when clearly you have no clue what even that term means. Go ahead and get back to bowing to barry oBOMB'a soetoro's "dope & strange" poster hanging in your mom's basement...clown.
I am disappointed he didn't talk more about the shortages in the physical markets earlier on in the video when they were pressing him. This drop is ONLY in the paper markets. Delays and premiums have made the physical price pretty stable over this drop. Premiums have gone from 5% to 25%
Because he's a conspiracy theorist supported by right-wing extremists who doesn't seem to understand basic economics. "Look at the long term purchasing power of the dollar, it's been devastating." Sure in nominal term, but not in real terms : in 1918 a gallon of gas was 3.84 2012$ and in 2012, it was 3.55$ 2012$. Between those 2 years, price has moved up and down like any other commodity, gold included. If you want real inflation, you would need to print money like Germany did in the 20s-30s.

I do care

About the whole blog idea. My web-site is kinda becoming my business card, so it must be pretty for people who's coming to see it. Previously the blogging was just the way to organize my thoughts about the interests in one place, e.g. thoughts to be brought to the page could be first aggregated in several posts in a very convenient form, as a simple ideas, then based on this information I can faster form greater posts. My biggest problem is sorting the information and providing the it in the right form. It harder than it seems. Plus I've got hard times recognizing the ways I can work or can't with printed material.

I've decided to add more girls and kids images to blog with the topic of bitcoin. That helps to attract my main audience first based on traffic source: facebook, the Arab people who's searching for girls here.
As I understand most of them searching the info about immigration that's why that's gonna become a focus of my blog topics. I think its fine to mix technology with the immigration law, plus immigration is definitely my area of expertise, it means that I somehow could be even useful with information provided on the site.

I understand that more informative top page may be way better than the feed of the articles. But since I don't have such opportunity for now - I will keep on trying providing the best articles I ever can. At the end of the day the interesting content is about interesting articles after a great introductory main page which is totally different level of web-site construction.

Bitcoin supporter's blogs


  • http://www.pacoahlgren.com/blog/

nTimeLock may disappoint you

I always had some issues with saving money. My mind is usually setup to use every accessible resource to fix the current situation and it makes me to spend all saved money for future.

In case with Bitcoin I read the posts from January 2010 on bitcoin forums, and see how people was ready to send 500 bitcoins ($1) to test Bitcoin, and reading the Bitcoin past is what inspires me to save Bitcoins now.

Bitcoin is such a system, which is deflationary. For hundreds of years people never had a deflationary currency (except for Gold, which grows with economy unsatisfactory slowly), and they forgot what "Money Work For You" or "The World's Money Work For You" or "Money Attaches More Money" is really look like.

But there is such a function which could potentially solve my problem. I know that with little effort I can create a transaction with nLockTime set up for 10 years as example. In the perfect world - this would mean me successfully accessing my funds 10 years from depositing.

Easy, calm down. There is a problem with nLockTime. All transactions is stored in blockchain, and Bitcoin isn't designed to store your nLockedByTime transactions in the blockchain with all transactions, because it would mean that miners must scan the whole blockchain to redeem chronologically locked transactions.

By design nLockTime grants ability to user to keep the data about transaction (you can store transaction as a raw data). Another thing about nLockTime is that once transaction created, it doesn't means that you can't access your sent funds anymore. Your outputs recorded in a public blockchain are still belonging to you. That means that you can overspend them with the other transaction.

So here's what it takes to limit yourself from spending your own funds for 10 years:
1) Create wallet A, deposit there 1 BTC
2) Create wallet B
3) Send funds from wallet A to wallet B locked by nTimeLock
4) Backup keys from wallet B, backup raw transaction data
5) Destroy wallet A keys

This is seems like easy steps to start saving. But I wouldn't recommend anybody to follow them. Why?
Because there's no warranties that its secure for long-term perspective.

Yes, Bitcoin protocol is reliable

Mentioned above 5 steps would be perfect if Bitcoin protocol stays permanent. But I afraid that during such a long times like a 10 years, some significant changes in Bitcoin protocol could occur. For such a long period of time a lots of things can change in the ways that protocol are functioning.

Significant changes may occur on the accepting the format of raw-data of the transactions, also changes may occur on acceptance of the locked by time transactions or any other kinds of data acceptances.

And even though Bitcoin is in my heart. I think the best solution for keeping your funds untouchable during long-term periods like 10 years is using cryptographic Time Capsules, if you're technologically savvy enough, if not - hire a freelancer.