This is how Tyranny Begins...

 They were peace keepers.. subsequently, they have been slowly corrupted into law keepers... Now who will enforce justice..? Our justice system has become the legal system... and Laws that are unjust, are still laws... Therefore, upheld by the legal system. But, they would have been rejected by the justice system

I personally give respect to police on a case by case basis. They will get respect from me if they give it or act like they deserve it. (not demand it). They are not All bad. Just carry camera's in case of a bad one.  

Only if we can quit bickering about trivial matters & unify 'we the people' about at least one or two things.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbids the government to deprive individuals of life, liberty, or property without "due process of law."2 In 1989 the U.S. Supreme Court stated, "Nothing in the language of the Due Process Clause itself requires the State to protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens against invasion by private actors."3 Generally, the Due Process Clause does not provide an affirmative right to government aid, "even where such aid may be necessary to secure life, liberty, or property interests of which the government itself may not deprive the individual."

Dumber is the person who didn't know this, so you guys. Plus some cops are usually little kids inside who always dreamed to become a cop to protect the people. Poor fellas didn't know the would be working to protect idiots who are willing to do anything to give them a hard time.

Does its going to get out of control?

Which law did they break? Who's law? If the people who work for us make the laws that are supposed to protect us and keep us safe then will this ever become true? There is irony in government! We put them there they're laws for us yet if broken they step on us?

It's up to citizens to protect themselves from tyranny. This is very disturbing since our tax goes toward the police who are a civilian security force. There is actually a lot of reason behind this.

That's upsetting. What this means then is either we hope that there are cops that do their job not for the power but for the sense of duty to others, or we stay active and up to date with local, state, and federal legislation that is being passed and ensure that we have the laws we want. Read interesting article about it in NY Times: Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone - New York Times
And by the way, enforcing the law and protecting the citizens, is two completely different things. What that means is, if ur in a dangerous situation the officers will respond only after the fact. They are not there to save you, just to pick up the pieces and imprison the guilty party. Same thing in Canada, the state is not responsible for ur safety, AND ur not allowed concealed carry, or any carry in that matter. A bit of an oxymoron.

AMENDMENT XIVSECTION 1.All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Warren v. District of Columbia[1] (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals (equivalent to a state supreme court) case that held police do not have a duty to provide police services to individuals, even if a dispatcher promises help to be on the way, except when police develop a special duty to particular individuals.